The Mayor of London has opened a consultation on plans to move City Hall from next to Tower Bridge to a location in the Royal Docks.

The GLA’s current Norman Foster designed building was opened in 2002 and is privately owned, so the GLA rents it for around £11 million a year. A break clause in the lease allows the GLA to move out, so they’ve been looking around for an alternative site.

The proposed site is The Crystal, an exhibition centre opened in the Royal Docks and had been rented out to Siemens, but they left it last year. It also happens to be owned by the GLA, and they project the move could save around £55 million over the next five years.

(c) The Crystal

The Crystal does have the advantage of already existing, so just needs refurbishing for the new occupants, and is roughly a 10-minute walk from Canning Town station on the Jubilee and DLR lines. It just so happens to also be right next door to that other major public transport service – the cable car, which can expect to see a huge increase in usage if City Hall were to move here.

Apart from the cost savings, part of the argument being put forward is that the move would support regeneration in the Royal Docks area, but that horse has long since bolted. Most of the area is regenerated already, and the industrial sites that remain are in active use. If those industrial sites were to be encouraged to move elsewhere, then property developers would be all to happy to snap them up, regardless of the location of City Hall.

The arrival of the Elizabeth line next year, and the planned addition of a new DLR station at Thames Wharf are required just to cope with current demand and support the last few patches of undeveloped land that are earmarked for development into residential properties.

It’s difficult to argue that City Hall moving here would be needed to support the building of more tower blocks of residential flats, as the close proximity of Canary Wharf already supplies plenty of demand for more housing around the area.

Regardless of the architectural and financial merits of a move to a new building, the current site has always had a democratic deficit. The land outside the building is privately owned, and it’s hard for protestors to exercise a right to protest, or even for the media to use the land outside for interviews.

Wherever it is that City Hall moves to, ensuring that the land around it is public should be one of the key requirements of any headquarters of a democratic organisation.

Tagged with: ,
SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE

This website has been running now for just over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, but doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether its a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what your read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

3 comments on “London City Hall could move to the docklands
  1. AC says:

    They are talking about supporting the London Enterprise Zone development being undertaken by GLA/Newham (https://lep.london/content_page/enterprise-zone).

    The land around the building is meant to be public land managed by Newham but that might (have) changed.

  2. JP says:

    A town hall not in the centre of town?
    Granted the current site is not the best and final spot as you have explained. The posited move down river smacks more of present-day financial coincidence than taking the long view.
    If regeneration is the key, what about the old Broadgate goods yard or somewhere similar?

  3. Chris Rogers says:

    Hard to see any civic or democratic improvement to moving the GA’s home that far out – whatever anyone likes to say, it’s remote. And ‘refurbishing’ surely doesn’t begin to touch what you would need to make the oddly shaped and rather pointless Crystal into a place of local government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*