Network Rail is warning that there will not be any trains in or out of London King’s Cross, and no Thameslink services via Finsbury Park, on Saturday 20th and Sunday 21st June.

The closure is the latest stage of the project which will eventually see a disused railway tunnel leading to King’s Cross reopened, allowing additional tracks to be laid so more trains can enter and exit the station.

There are enough platforms, but the bottleneck on the approach to the station causes delays. At the moment, there are four tracks in two tunnels on the approach to the station, and when finished, there will be six tracks in three tunnels, so less chance of a train approaching the station being held up waiting for space.

Disused tunnel on the right side (c) Network Rail

They are also shifting a lot of the crossovers on the tracks further north to simplify the network layout, which makes it much more reliable to operate.

When combined with upgrades elsewhere on the route, the East Coast Upgrade will also deliver capacity for operators to run more trains, adding an extra 10,000 seats every day. Apart from increasing capacity on the line, the cleaned-up layout allows the new Azuma fleet to utilise its increased acceleration when leaving the station so journeys can be slightly quicker.

Edited track layout diagrams based on Network Rail originals

Keen eyes might spot that the revamp loses a platform – that’s so there’s space lengthen and widen the platforms for longer trains. Technically, platform 10 goes, and platform 11 becomes the new platform 10.

All this work means closures though to do the engineering works.

On the Govia Thameslink Railway network, no Great Northern or Thameslink services will run on the East Coast Main Line into King’s Cross, St Pancras or Moorgate. Rail replacement buses will operate from Potters Bar and New Barnet to London Underground stations.

On LNER services, rail replacement buses will operate between St Neots and Bedford where those still travelling can take Thameslink services via Kentish Town into London.

Tagged with: , ,
SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE

This website has been running now for just over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, but doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether its a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what your read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

7 comments on “No trains from Kings Cross next weekend
  1. Tim Ottevanger says:

    Wouldn’t it make sense to use this opportunity to change the platform numbering and get rid of the ridiculous platform 0 and go from 1 to 11?

    • ianvisits says:

      That would involve a huge amount of resignalling work long most of the line — and offer no practical benefit to passengers.

  2. JP says:

    There’s less access to and from some platforms too.
    If you’re on the up line in the western Copenhagen tunnel for instance, you can soon only get to platforms 7 – 10/11, whereas now you can get as far east as platform 1. Other quibbles are available if you have the inclination and a little too much time.
    I imagine that things have probably not gone to plan if you have to dive across the whole throat of the station at the last chance, but I think that “future-proofing” entails removal of all restrictions and opening of all opportunities.

  3. Martin Benson says:

    Isn’t this just going to move the bottleneck from Gasworks Tunnel into Copenhagen Tunnel?

  4. Clive Wilkins says:

    The elephant in the room for capacity constraints is the two line section through Welwyn. Where are the plans to improve this ? It makes all other planned improvements less cost effective.

  5. Jordan D says:

    To think of the massive amount they spent on creating Plat 0, “because of capacity constraints” only to lose it a few years later.

    • ChrisC says:

      Where did you get the idea that 0 is going from?

      It’s clearly still there in the before and after diagrams.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*