If someone said, design me something pointless then cover it in hype, then The Tide in Greenwich would be the result.

The first stage in what is claimed to be a linear park wrapping around the peninsula, and almost universally derided as probably the worst example of public amenity built in the past few decades.

Based superficially on the elevated HighLines that have sprung up all over the place following the success of the much larger and better former derelict railway in New York, this is the Tesco Value version, wrapped in Harrods packaging.

On a busy Sunday lunchtime with people out jogging along the riverside, walking dogs along the riverside and walking themselves along the riverside, no one is diverting sideways to climb the stairs up to the Tide.

It’s an empty pier jutting over the promenade, and yet, said to be the main attraction of the new blocks of flats that are slowly obscuring the Dome from view.

If it were the High Line, on which it is loosely modeled, there would be planting to delight, but this is a windswept barren land, with a few trees and a paucity of grasses, chosen more for their low cost of maintenance than to be appealing.

Some chairs for the people who don’t come up here to sit on.

I often judge good architecture by the details. Not just does the skyscraper look good from a mile away, but the details when standing next to it. Is the end result polished and of a high quality. The Gherkin is good, the Shard is bad — and oh boy, the Tide is awful.

The edges lack the finesse that comes from an architect who looks at the small details. The steps are not entirely finished properly, and the painted flooring is showing the all-too-obvious effects of people scuffing over it. I really can’t imagine a Norman Foster building ever having a junction built with such a lack of attention to the finer details as they have here. It’s functional, but looks cheap.

At the end of the pier, the central section rises ever so slightly above the edges, resulting in another obvious problem, that people can trip over the edges, so now there’s a run of shabby barriers all around it.

All of which explains the many warning signs dotted around the place asking people to mind their step as they “enjoy” the architecture. It’s a structure designed by an architect to look good(ish), but not to be of use. It goes nowhere, and is in places so badly designed as to be essentially unsafe. A good urban planner would have looked at the early designs and ripped half of it to pieces, and in doing so, what might have emerged could have been a more useful space for the public.

In an attempt to hide these deficiencies, all around are headline name works of art, which fits the modern vanity for brand names over substance, and suits the nearby equally ghastly Icon shopping centre.

The overall effect is less a public utility or attraction than a box-ticking exercise by housing developers who now try to pretend that they’re selling lifestyle experiences rather than homes — mainly because the homes are shrinking as fast as their prices are rising, so you need to be out of them as much as possible to avoid feeling like you’re living in a prison cell.

What’s disappointing though is that this could have been good. Decent quality of finish to the end product, and a design that connected locations rather than floating pointlessly above an already perfectly usable pathway.

The space it fills could have been a large public park, at ground level, of considerable more utility than this folly of a pier. But maybe that would have been too welcoming, too popular, too noisy for the residents. So we have the pier, the Tide, an empty expanse of steel and cheaply fitted wood.

With the interest in urban walkways, with the popularity of the High Line, and the remarkable resurgence of the City of London pedways, that this is so utterly awful is actually quite annoying.

Tagged with:
SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE

This website has been running now for just over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, but doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether its a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what your read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

14 comments on “The Tide, Greenwich’s pointless folly
  1. So, basically, “bah! humbug!” ?

  2. Peter says:

    I found it rather pointless but a pleasant enough diversion to pass a few minutes and, camera in hand, get a few interesting perspectives

  3. Cassiel says:

    A design detail you might have missed, but which I caught by virtue of working in the area, is the vast slabs of polystyrene that were brought in to fill out the “hills” of landscaped vegetation surrounding the construction.

  4. DSEAH says:

    Sounds like the natives are up in arms because the bloody yanks are over here cocking things up…. again.

    Amazingly shallow reporting. Judging urban projects by looking at the details is very off the cuff and not very helpful.

    HST, you do wonder how the structure will weather over time and the maintenance overheads. These kind of projects need to be evaluated 10-20 years down the line. All that painted steel will be a problem then I expect.

    • Jonesy says:

      Come on now. This thing is an urban eyesore that will likely be repurposed completely or dismantled in 10 years to make room for something useful. Then again this is Greenwich we’re talking about, so they’ll probably replicate it a few times over.

  5. Trevor Skingle says:

    Been here once or twice on my way elsewhere along the peninsula and total under whelmed. The term Emperor’s new clothes comes to mind. Good for reaching the path along the Thames but that is about it

  6. Trevor Skingle says:

    …and just to add that I’ve been on the Highline in NYC many times (I lived in NYC whilst working for the NYC Dept of Parks and Recreation) and this doesn’t even come anywhere near it

  7. Rodney Nairne says:

    Trmed locally as the “Bridge to Nowhere”. It like the new sculptures are a waste of money and we assume a tick the box on some development plan. It shows little thought and at best is useless.

  8. Kash says:

    There’s miles of it yet to be constructed. As this is only phase 1.

  9. Rodney Nairne says:

    As you wonder the Greenwich Peninsula you will find the tag “The Tide” on the Thames Path and many local paths. It’s like the developer is taking over older roads and pretending there is a plan. Stealing older paths is not development.

  10. I know it’s easy to be negative, but it’s nice to see a developer not just building high rise blocks of flats to sell. British developers failed to develop the peninsula for decades, and at last knight dragon brought in the Hong Kong vision and dynamism to London. Thank you Knights Dragon from a resident on the peninsula. These are often the same people who said that the dome was an architectural folly. How wrong can they be. More creative approach to the community areas on the peninsula is welcome. The real question is when will greenwich council spend some of the money given to them by Knight Dragon to give peninsula residents services. Can this web site ask that.

    • ianvisits says:

      “I know it’s easy to be negative” <-- As it happens, I really dislike writing bad reviews. Gives me a headache, but if something is bad, then I wont lie about it, even if I feel pretty crap afterwards.

  11. Rhys says:

    “I really dislike writing bad reviews.” Then just say nothing?

    The Tide is a pleasant place to visit if you happen to be in the area, nothing more, nothing less.

    • ianvisits says:

      If something is bad, say it’s bad, don’t pretend or lie about it.

      Otherwise you end up with yet another of those publications that thinks everything is totes amazeballs and how everyone is just great and wonderful. Yeuk!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*