No not that one, the other one. No, not that one either, the other one. Yes, this one — the giant airport right in the centre of London on the Thames, next to Parliament.


Sometimes an image exists, one which crops up occasionally on websites with little other than a comment about how daft the idea is. I try to dig in deeper and find out how that image came to be, what was the thinking behind it.

Sometimes, the research hits a brick wall.

I know that there was talk of an airport in central London, which would have covered the Thames. I know this was in the early 1930s, around the same time as rival plans at Kings Cross or for the roof of Waterloo Station were talked about.

But, other than a drawing in the Popular Science magazine, nothing else seems to be known about this crazy scheme.

There were other schemes for an “airport spanning the Thames”, as this one in the Getty archive shows.

As it happens, using the Thames as an airport was not in itself an unknown factor, as there were experiments with landing flying boats on the Thames, as shown here at Westminster (with the old Lambeth Bridge), or here passing through Tower Bridge.

But the gigantic aerodrome that would have seen planes taking off next to MP’s offices. Sorry, just a single drawing in an 80 year old magazine.


Had such an airport been built in Central London at the time, it would today be obsolete, as naturally aircraft need longer runways, so would it have been demolished, or would it today be home to range of lightweight buildings, or even a park?


Popular Science, March 1934

Flight Magazine, 25th January 1934


Be the first to know what's on in London, and the latest news published on ianVisits.

You can unsubscribe at any time from my weekly emails.

Tagged with: ,

This website has been running now for over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, it doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether it's a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what you read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

  1. Bob Mallett says:

    Has any thoughts been given as to The effect on the river beneath in 24 hour darkness?

  2. Sykobee says:

    Keep this photo away from Boris!

  3. Spencer says:

    Regarding the last paragraph: I assume it would have been repurposed into luxury flats with a quirky aviation related name on the building.

Home >> News >> Unbuilt London