The lingering spectre of the Euston Arch hangs heavy over Euston Station, but now there’s a tribute to the arch installed where it once stood. That happens to be on the ramp leading down to platforms 8-11, which is a reminder of why it had to go in the first place, it was right in the middle of where the enlarged Euston station needed to be built.

Using funding from the Railway Heritage Trust, Network Rail installed a couple of print replicas of the arch’s massive columns have been placed on the platform ramp in the exact location where the originals stood, with a small sign between them indicating what they represent.

There’s also a large video screen that shows a series of images of the Arch from its birth through to death. Importantly, the photos also show the Arch as it was in the 1950s, after all the land around had built up, so in effect, it was on a side street and cramped in between other buildings.

The printed columns are a bit easy to miss when walking past during the rush hour unless you spot the sign by them and stop to read it, and most of the people on my visit raced past the video to get on a train, but a couple stopped to have a short look.

Andy Savage, executive director at the Railway Heritage Trust, said: “The decision to demolish the Euston Arch totally, rather than relocate it as originally proposed, was one of the greatest mistakes of 1950’s and 60’s railway architecture, although happily its sister structure at Birmingham still shows us its style and size. The RHT is delighted to have been able to propose and fund this scheme, which both shows clearly where the arch was located, and commemorates a great structure.”

NEWSLETTER

Be the first to know what's on in London, and the latest news published on ianVisits.

You can unsubscribe at any time from my weekly emails.

Tagged with:
SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE

This website has been running now for over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, it doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether it's a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what you read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

8 comments
  1. Thomas says:

    Very interesting. Just one thing, are we sure about being constructed of Bramley granite? I’ve never heard of it and being from near a place called Bramley in Leeds I was curious so looked it up and there’s nothing on the internet about this stone at all. Digging further there are multiple sources that say the Arch was constructed of sandstone.

    Maybe sandstone from Bramley was Bramley granite? All very mysterious

  2. alistair twin says:

    Thomas: Agree that it’s very very unlikely to be granite.. Dan cruikshank’s programme on it described is as “The arch is made of stone from the Bramley Fall quarry in Yorkshire which is incredibly hard, almost like granite.”

    The wikipedia does call it a sandstone, which is almost certainly correct given the way it has weathered in images

  3. alistair twin says:

    indeed it is a Gritstone, a hard type of sandstone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bramley_Fall_stone

    • Thomas says:

      Very interesting thanks, I feel the sign would have been better saying Bramley Fall stone!

  4. John W says:

    Lets hope that one day the Euston Arch will be respectfully reconstructed in the vicinity of Euston Station to serve once more as an entrance way.

  5. Lamb says:

    Wasn’t there some talk of it being dredged up from the River Lea and reconstructed somewhere?

    • ianVisits says:

      There’s always been talk of it – but no one seems willing to stump up the £70 million plus cost of building a pointless folly.

  6. Andy Savage says:

    Also, if it were built where suggested, between the ‘Tap’ Lodges, it would be destroying the dole remsi g bit of the historic station to create faux heritage- not to mention what TfL might say with the proximity to the Met / Circle / H&C lines

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

Home >> News >> Transport News