One of the pleasures of living in the docklands area is the ability to walk along the riverside – although the council required private housing to provide a river path which is nice, but declined to make the same requirement for its own housing, which is less nice.

Anyway, a stretch of pathway right next to Canary Wharf riverside pier was blocked off over a year ago for the construction of three tall glass blocks known as Riverside South. This caused quite a considerable problem for locals, as there isn’t a convenient walking route around the diversion, and thanks to a lot of pedestrian crossings, several road junctions, and two sets of steps/lifts – it added 5-10 minutes to the journey time.

However, adding to the misery, is that work on the building site ground to a halt over six months ago, and a perfectly usable riverside path was still being barred to entry. A lobby group was set up to try and change things.

Earlier this week, the route was – somewhat grudgingly – reopened by the developers/Canary Wharf – but only after adding a lot of frankly totally unnecessary 2-metre high fencing around it.

Some context – the map below shows the route affected. Blue is the old/restored route and red shows the diversion. The distance isn’t much further, but does involve lots of delays due to the need to cross five roads.

Blue is old/restored route - red is diversion

Approaching from the south, the old dock bridge that was perfectly fine for everyone has now had high fencing put along it, and the flat surface has been turned into a slope.

OK, there are a couple of steps at the other side which has now been covered over by the slope, and we should seek to be accessible for everyone now, so that bit is understandable.

New slope on old level bridge

Then it is a wide tarmac covered path with high green fencing all the rest of the way to the other end.

Riverside walkway

I presume the sign refers to the land I am standing on, not the river on the other side.

Presumably the land you are on, not the river the sign is "protecting"?

So, yes it is nice to have the path back, and it is kinda nice to have it freshly lain with new tarmac, but a lot of the fuss seems to be that they felt that they had to install the fencing, some more CCTV, and a surprising amount of lighting.

However, take a walk along the pathway at North Greenwich, and in many places there is no fencing at all between human and river, the path is gravel and the lighting sporadic. No one dies along there (that I know of), so why the need for all this additional work at Canary Wharf? The old building site path was perfectly usable.

And the whole thing closes again in six months time.

While the three skyscrapers are still on-hold, there will be some interim works to raise up the level of the building site to street level and leave a flat open space. Probably in time to be hired out for Olympic related events as will be happening on the other side of Canary Wharf.

They claim that the building works make it too dangerous for people to walk past the building site – although oddly, the same problems don’t seem to stop people driving past just as close on the other side of the building site.

I can understand, and agree with the need to close the path if deliveries from the river are taking place – or something specific takes place that would imperil people – but a total shut-down seems overkill.

We better enjoy it while we can.

Abandoned foundations

The abandoned building site

The fenced off riverside route

The newly fenced off riverside path


Be the first to know what's on in London, and the latest news published on ianVisits.

You can unsubscribe at any time from my weekly emails.

Tagged with: ,

This website has been running now for over a decade, and while advertising revenue contributes to funding the website, it doesn't cover the costs. That is why I have set up a facility with DonorBox where you can contribute to the costs of the website and time invested in writing and research for the news articles.

It's very similar to the way The Guardian and many smaller websites are now seeking to generate an income in the face of rising costs and declining advertising.

Whether it's a one-off donation or a regular giver, every additional support goes a long way to covering the running costs of this website, and keeping you regularly topped up doses of Londony news and facts.

If you like what you read on here, then please support the website here.

Thank you

  1. Alan Burkitt-Gray says:

    Great news. I hope it’s OK for cyclists too. I used to enjoy cycling from the City to Greenwich on the north bank, but gave up when that path was closed. I’ll try it again, once the weather improves … but I must check the foot tunnel first.

  2. Wow, that has been closed a long, long time! I better make a diary note to do that ride in the next few months while I get the chance – the detour by bike was a total pain but I hadn’t even considered how much more annoying it was for pedestrians.

  3. Steph says:

    Great news indeed. It’s a shame they are building another ugly business skyscraper, they should make it a park that would be an amazing place to hang out specially next to the Thames Clipper pier. The London skyline looks uglier and uglier.

    • IanVisits says:

      I’m sure if you can come up with a few hundred million pounds, then I am sure they would be delighted to sell the land to you for conversion into a park.

      Docklands is quite a green area already though – with mudchute park, the city farm, various parks in Canary Wharf and several parks dotted around the riverside.

  4. Anth says:

    Unfortunately it’s been blocked off again. Added to that, the traffic lights at the junction/roundabout of Westferry Road and Marsh Walk are covered over and out of action. If you run or cycle in the area, it’s now become a real pain to circum-navigate that 50 metres – you pretty much end up going through the crowds near the Tube station.

Home >> News >> Miscellaneous